Home

» Florida Critical Alert: Sheriffs Still Attacking Second Amendment Rights

SB-296 Firearms/Mandatory Evacuations is a bill to allow law-abiding citizens to take their firearms with them when they are in the act of evacuating while complying with a mandatory evacuation order under a declared state of emergency. This bill will keep law-abiding citizens from being arrested and having their firearms confiscated for taking their firearms with them when they evacuate.

The Florida Sheriffs Association, while proclaiming their support for the Second Amendment, continues to actively OPPOSE this legislation and your right to bear arms. They have continued to spread MISINFORMATION about SB-296 by Brandes and HB-209 by Fitzenhagen relating to Mandatory Evacuations under a declared State of Emergency.

The Sheriffs claim that, “The law already permits transporting securely encased firearms in motor vehicles, and it allows those with an appropriate permit to carry concealed firearms,”is not accurate.

» Mayor renew call for gun legislation

A trio of Triangle mayors led by Durham’s Bill Bell on Thursday sought to put pressure on U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan to support an expansion of mandated pre-purchase background checks of would-be firearms owners.
…
The mayors at Thursday’s event had to deal with pushback from critics of the potential legislation, particular Sean Sorrentino, a Raleigh blogger who terms himself “pro-choice on self-defense.”

Sorrentino said the prospective background-check legislation would make “me, my wife and my friend into felons” by unduly restricting loans or even momentary transfers of possession of a firearm.

Bell and Kleinschmidt rejected the criticism, Kleinschmidt arguing the bill would only cover sales and ensure that “the people purchasing firearms are not felons or seriously mentally ill.”

Sorrentino’s blog response:

This is one of two things. Either the mayors know this is a lie, or they are so ignorant of the law being proposed that they don’t know it covers every transfer. Here’s the law itself

‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘transfer’–

‘(A) shall include a sale, gift, loan, return from pawn or consignment, or other disposition; and

‘(B) shall not include temporary possession of the firearm for purposes of examination or evaluation by a prospective transferee while in the presence of the prospective transferee.

» JUAN WILLIAMS WIFE ROBBED, WISHES SHE HAD GUN

» Someone Who’s Not David Gregory faces tax investigation after absurd gun prosecution

Witashek was aggressively prosecuted [by] the same D.C. Office of Attorney General that refused to prosecute David Gregory for a clear gun law violation, all because Witaschek was found in possession of an inoperable shotgun shell and “muzzle loader” bullets
…
“I think the police wanted to confiscate my guns from the beginning. They are really angry that I didn’t comply,” the businessman explained. “They will use whatever government resources they choose to get what they wanted — or make me pay. They already used the U.S. attorney, a grand jury, the D.C. attorney general, and now the Office of Tax and Revenue.”

He added, “I don’t think they’ll stop here. After two years of this, why would they?”
…
When the goverment wants to get you, it stops at nothing.

I find the most scandalous element of this from purely just a human point of view, is the fact that the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, with the bodies of the dead lying in front of her and with the families there, brought up the video and said a video with which we had nothing to do, and then according to one of the family members, when she went over to console that family member, she said ‘We’re going to get the guy who did the video.’

Now, that to me, if she knew that this was a phony story and I’m not sure I can understand how it would be otherwise, is a form of deception that I think is truly scandalous.

Krauthammer on the sad, amoral, and pathetic excuse for a human being known as Hillary Clinton

» Newly Released Emails Reveal Obama Admin’s Reaction to Benghazi

Emails obtained by Judicial Watch have revealed that the top priority after the Benghazi terrorist attack was not national security nor was it ensuring a proper investigation into who orchestrated an attack on our consulate that left four Americans dead.

No, the priority of top advisors in the earliest days after the Benghazi attack was ensuring that President Obama “looked good” prior the 2012 election.
… more in-line with a public relations strategy dedicated to damage control rather than dealing with the terrorist attack that killed Americans

HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS: Administration’s Benghazi Lies Were an “Effort to Protect, Re-Elect Obama”

The cover-up is confirmed.
Cold-blooded lies invented to hide the fact that American heroes fought and died while awaiting a rescue that would never come.

…
In light of this discovery, will the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, finally name a Select Committee on Benghazi?

Will Darrell “Inspector Clouseau” Issa explain why a watchdog group like Judicial Watch — and not his unfocused and possibly incompetent Oversight Committee — is doing all of the heavy lifting in this investigation?

Will the media finally admit that they are co-conspirators in the cover-up?

Since moderate Democrats have gone the way of the dodo bird, whoever runs against the GOP in 2016 will be bidding for the equivalent of a third term for Obama. That means Obama’s failures and lies must be driven home again and again

Don’t forget any of this nightmare — and don’t let anyone else.

We’ve uncovered in recent months that tremendous political pressure, coming from Democrats both in Congress and the White House, likely caused Lois Lerner and the IRS to begin targeting conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.

There is even evidence in the form of emails between Lerner and other IRS employees that there was collaboration between the agency and the Department of Justice to harass and bully conservative organizations to make it difficult for them to be involved in the political process.

Tea Party Republicans In House Draw Line In the Sand, Warn Boehner To Take Heed

A reader in Bradford recalled asking a West Yorkshire officer on the street that day why the various “Muslim community leaders” weren’t being arrested for incitement to murder. The officer said they’d been told to “play it cool”. The calls for blood got more raucous. My correspondent asked his question again. The policeman told him to “F— off, or I’ll arrest you.”

And so it has gone, ever more openly, across the ensuing quarter-century. Point out problematic aspects of Islam, and the British state’s response is “F— off, or I’ll arrest you.” Her Majesty’s Constabulary do not yet police their charges quite as strictly as the Saudi mutaween, but they’re getting there: The day after Drummer Lee Rigby was hacked to death in broad daylight on the streets of London, a march in support of the “Help for Heroes” military charity led to a five-hour standoff between marchers and police, ending with the arrest of Lee Cousins for “mocking the Islamic prayer ritual” by getting down on his hands and knees outside the pub. He was fined 600 pounds.

When was the last time someone was fined 600 quid for mocking any bit of Christian ritual?

» Telling the Truth about Terrorism and Islamic Charities

Shawcross’s rightful concern was that some charities in the UK as elsewhere in Western democracies purportedly raise funds to provide aid for desirable objectives, and do so to some extent, but that they are also engaged in money laundering to organizations that are involved, directly or indirectly, with terrorist groups. More specifically, Shawcross found that some people accused of terrorist offenses serve as charity trustees.

…
Oxfam, though now universally famous for its acute knowledge of the precise conditions in Israeli settlements, did not know, as every schoolboy in London does, that the East London Mosque is a notorious cauldron of anti-Western and anti-Semitic hatred. One of the individuals, Sakeel Begg, due to speak at another event at the Mosque, describes jihad as “the greatest of deeds.” The Mosque has also entertained other speakers such as Saad al-Beraik who refers to Jews as “monkeys,” and calls on Palestinians not to “have mercy or compassion on the Jews,” and to wage jihad against them.
…
A brief film to be shown at the opening of the National September 11 Memorial Museum refers to those who committed the crime of 9/11 as terrorists whose mission is jihad. Some clerics dislike this wording, arguing that it casts aspirations on all Muslims. Clearly it does no such thing. It is incumbent to call terrorists by their right name, whether in this particular case or in reference to British “charities” which camouflage their real intentions.

» Islamist PC Police Seek To Bury Truth At 9/11 Museum

An imam objects to a film set to be shown at the National September 11 Memorial Museum because it might make people believe radical Islam was involved in the terrorist attacks. We’re not making this up.

» Yahya Snow Advocates Sucking on the Tongues of Children

I suppose we should all thank Yahya for showing us how rational and practical Islam is. Shame on us for thinking that Muhammad’s teachings are absurd and that his earliest followers were shockingly gullible for mindlessly accepting everything he said.

Welcome to Islam, my friends, and to the wild and wonderful world of Islamic apologetics!

This is what the brass does with its time instead of resolving the war in Afghanistan or figuring out what to do if Putin moves on to Poland when he is done absorbing the Ukraine.

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. For each privileged oppressed person upon whom “fair treatment” is bestowed by the authorities, there will be a normal person who doesn’t get the promotion because he isn’t sufficiently “diverse.”

But governing by Constitution? What a quaint and provincial idea. I keep thinking, maybe this time we might just try it. Heck, we’ve either tried or been witness to every other failed type of Government. Why not give it a go? Why not try a constitutionally constrained Representative Republic?
The United States Constitution spells out plainly how to get it right, what is allowed and what isn’t. Although this seems like a simple concept, and it is, lawmakers, the courts, and academia purposely make it seem that the average Joe could never truly comprehend it.

… the next time you hear the words, “Original Intent,” that is what it meant. Let’s keep in mind that our elected officials take an oath to uphold the Constitution. If they lie about this, then they’ll lie about anything.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/15355/brand-new-concept-governing-constitution/#FzZlIbe3Avy1uTW1.99

One person not morally preening or saying anything at all on the matter of Clayton Lockett’s execution is Stephanie Neiman. In all the discussion over how Clayton Lockett was executed, few have paid attention to Miss. Neiman.

Clayton Lockett beat her, bound her with duct tape, covered her mouth, shot her, then buried her alive.

Just remember that while you are posturing over how Clayton Lockett died.