Victims

VICTIMS OF ISLAM
Approximate numbers of people butchered and maimed by Islamic assholes by year.
(Butchered/Maimed)
(by Nov 13 2018)
2018: 10,071/ 10,213

2017: 16,386 / 14,360
2016: 21,413 / 26,730
2015: 27,588 / 26,136
2014: 32,862 / 27,522
2013: 16,774 / 29,577
2012: 11,546 / 20,254
2011: 9,086 / 16,921
2010: 9,233 / 17,461
2009: 9,176/ 18,612
2008: 10,798 / 18,088
2007: 20,478 / 27,317
2006: 15,245 / 19,496
2005: 7,625 / 12,855
2004: 7,166 / 14,574

Carefully gleaned from ReligionOfPeace.com

VICTIMS OF
GLOBAL WARMING
Deaths : 0
Injuries : 0



Favorites







Categories

Gathering of Eagles

January 26, 2008
OCAM1
The NC Gathering of Eagles sponsored an Operation to demonstrate support for and celebrate the American Military. April 4, 2009
OCAM2
The NC Gathering of Eagles sponsored a second Operation to demonstrate support for and celebrate the American Military in Jacksonville, NC. May 18, 2007
Recruiter Appreciation 1
May 16, 2008
Recruiter Appreciation 2
June 29 2007
Walter Reed
June 30, 2007
Ft Monmouth, NJ
Little Washington, NC
The Seven-Week
Moonbat Infestation
Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
Week 5 Week 6 Week 7
Charlotte, NC
Code Poink
Moonbats in
Smithfield, NC
Chapel Hill
Moonbats Attack
Recruiters Office
Fort Bragg,NC
Westboro Scarabaeus
Raleigh, NC
F.I.S.T. Hissy Fit
About This Site
Dont Feed the Moonbats
The Works Of ...
You can email me at
bubba @ whatbubbaknows.com

Login

Site search

WBK Supports









BookMarks

Infidel Brotherhood
Atlas Shrugs
Bare Naked Islam
Creeping Sharia
Gates of Vienna
Jawa Report
Jihad Watch
MEMRI
Religion of Peace
The Body of Truth

Shall Not Be Infringed
American Rifleman
AmmoLand
An NC Gun Blog
Bad Blue Guns
Bearing Arms
BorePatch
Bullets First
Days of Our Trailers
Double Tapper
Extrano's Alley
F. Paul Valone
From The Barrel of a Gun
Girls Just Wanna Have Guns
Grass Roots North Carolina
Gun Free Zone
GUNS.com
Keep and Bear Arms
Smallest Minority
The Truth About Guns
The War on Guns
About Our Military
Black Five
Mudville Gazette
This Aint Hell
Global Warming Crap
CFACT
Climate Depot
JoNova
No Frakking Consensus
Real Science
TallBloke's Talkshop
THE HOCKEY SCHTICK
TOM NELSON
Watts Up With That?
N.C. Bloggers
An NC Gun Blog
Cold Fury
Free North Carolina
From The Barrel of a Gun
Hillbilly White Trash
Jane Q. Public
Katy's Conservative Corner
Lady Liberty 1885
Lorie Byrd
No Feet Required!
Red State
Silence Do Good
Sister Toldjah
Sweet Tea & Livermush
The Locker Room
Resources
American and Proud
American Daily
American Digest
American Power Blog
American Rifleman
American Spectator
American Thinker
Another Black Conservative
Astute Blogger
Atlas Shrugs
Autonomous Mind
Bad Blue Guns
Bill Whittle
Black & Right
Black Five
Black Sphere
Bookworm Room
Carolina Pixel
CNSNews
Cold Fury
Confederate Yankee
Constituting America
Covertress
Crawfish's Swamp
Debbie Schlussel
Dillard Doctrine
Doug Ross Journal
Earl of Taint
Emerging Corruption
Enter Stage Right
EPA Abuse
Four Right Wing Wackos
Gates of Vienna
Gateway Pundit
Girls Just Wanna Have Guns
Global Warming Hoax
Gun Slingers Journal
Haunting the Library
Infidels Are Cool
InstaPundit
iOwnTheWorld
Jammie Wearing Fools
Joshua Pundit
KeyWiki
Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion
Macho Sauce Productions
Maggie's Notebook
Mere Rhetoric
Michelle Malkin
MoonBattery
National Black Republican Association
NCFire
Neo Neocon
New Zeal
News Busters
Nice Deb
No Frakking Consensus
Noisy Room
North Shore Journal
On Racism and Republicans
Out of Order
Pat Dollard
Patriot Room
Poor Richard's News
Real Clear Politics
Red Planet Cartoons
Red State
Religion of Peace
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Screed of Momus
Sipsey Street Irregulars
Sister Toldjah
Slap Stick Politics
Smallest Minority
Street Sweeper Chronicles
Sultan Knish
Sweasel
Sweet Tea & Livermush
Texas Darlin
The Daily Bayonet
Thomas More Law Center
Torch Light
Town Hall
Vocal Minority
Watts Up With That?
Weasel Zippers
Western Center for Journalism
Wolf Howling

Archives

Our Delusion

“There are those who are trying to persuade the world that the story is not true. They are committing the greatest indignity human beings can inflict on one another: telling people who have suffered excruciating pain and loss that their pain and loss are delusions. Perhaps there is a greater indignity; it is committed by those who believe them.
Introduction to “Night”, by Elie Wiesel, holocaust survivor

OUR OWN LETHAL DELUSION
by Leonard Magruder

The excellent documentary, “Islam: What the West Needs to Know”, by Gregory Davis, begins with Bush, Clinton, and Blair all assuring us that Islam is a “religion of peace”. In the remaining part of the film five top experts on Islam document, often by quoting direct from the Koran, that this is not true. Islam is the root cause of international terrorism.The delusion that it is not is spread by politicians, media and academic elites, and is therefore widely held by the American public.The delusion is sustained by ignoring history, facts, and the danger.

IGNORING HISTORY

There has never been a time when the world did not know of the danger posed to liberty by the religion of Islam. It is absolutely unbelievable how media, university, and now the Obama administration have managed to erase this knowledge from American consciousness. This is probably the most profound betrayal in the history of America. A great nation, misled, disarmed, helpless, before the greatest threat imaginable. Just so media and academia can continue to cling to their left/liberal mythologies, such as multiculturalism and political correctness..

Wrote the great Middle East scholar Sir William Muir in 1856 in his 4-volume “Life of Muhammad,” “The sword of Muhammad, and the Koran, are the most stubborn enemies of Civilization, Liberty, and Truth, which the world has yet known.”

Alexis de Tocqueville, famous 18th century historian:

“I studied the Koran a great deal. I am convinced that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. So far as I can see, it is the principle cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world.”

John Quincy Adams, early American president:

“Muhammad proclaimed himself a messenger of Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth.He declared exterminating war as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his religion is violence and lust. As long as the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth.”

Winston Churchill, British Prime Minister:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its followers! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next life of its dignity and sanctity. No more backward force exists in this world.”

But the issue became part of American history under Adams, who wrote of Muslim treaties:

“The victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace and the faithful follower of the prophet may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat, but the command to propagate the Muslim creed by the sword is always obligatory when it can be made effective.
Such is the spirit which governs the hearts of men to whom treachery and violence are taught as principles of religion.The appeal to the natural hatred of the Muslim towards the infidel is in just accordance with the precepts of the Koran.
No state paper from a Christian hand could, without trampling the precepts of its Lord, have commenced with an open proclamation of hatred to any portion of the human race. The Muslim, however, lays it down as the foundation of his discourse.

During the First Barbary War, 1801-1805, in a joint message to Congress Adams and Jefferson described the audacity of Muslim terrorist attacks, They described how when they asked the ambassador from Tripoli on what grounds these outrageous acts of unbridled savagery could be justified, the Ambassador answered that it was founded on the laws of the prophet, that it is written in the Koran that “all nations who should not have acknowledged Islam’s authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found.”
(Sura 9:5 from the Koran.”Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them…lie in ambush everywhere for them.”)

None of this history is ever mentioned by our elite in media, academia, or government or in our sschools.. It has all been erased, just as Obama ordered the erasure of all books critical of Islam from the FBI library.We first exposed this situation in our article “Pressure on FBI to Lie About Islam” posted on wmdterror.com on Oct.18. 2011, following that up with articles on Oct. 27, 2011, and March 15, 2012:

“What has happened is that the FBI, seeking to put together a comprehensive library of books on Islam managed to include a significant number of those authors who discuss the Median or violent verses in the Koran, the true root cause of terrorism. Obama ordered that these books be removed.

Dwight C. Holton, the U.S. Attorney in Oregon said he had spoken with Holder directly about the issue of the terror training materials.
“I want to be perfectly clear about this: training materials that portray Islam as a religion of violence or with a tendency towards violence are wrong, they are offensive, and they are contrary to everything that this president, this attorney general and Department of Justice stands for,” Holton said Wednesday. “They will not be tolerated.”

On the claim by academics, media elites and others that terrorists are “misinterpreting Islam”, one of our most powerful thinkers, Hugh Fitzgerald of “Jihad Watch,” has written the definitive challenge to that claim. We urge all those who read this article, especially the many Vietnam veteran groups we reach, copy this statement by Fitzgerald, march on the university and the media, hand it out, and demand answers. Let this, along with our proposal below, signal the beginning of the rollback of the cover-up by our media and academic elites of Islam as the “root cause” of terrorism, hiding behind “misinterpreting Islam.”

Eric Holder, The American Government, and the Diminishing of Public Trust
by Hugh Fitzgerald

A statement by Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States:

    “What we’ve seen in the recent past, I think, is an indication of one of the things that we’re going to have to be most concerned about in the future, this self-radicalization of American citizens or people who reside in the United States. They have too often come under the influence of people who have misinterpreted Islam.”

Could Eric Holder tell us exactly in what ways — quoting from the texts of Islam – the jihadis are misinterpreting Islam? How is Mr. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab misinterpreting Islam? How, for that matter, is Nasrallah of Hizballah, or Meshaal of Hamas, or the leaders or members of Lashkar-e-Toiba, or Jaish-e-Muhammad, or Al Qaeda, along with thousands of groups and millions of individuals, all of whom take what Islam teaches very much to heart, “misinterpreting Islam”?

We are told this over and over. We are never given a single bit of proof, not a single interpolated or apocryphal passage, attributed to the Koran, Hadith, Sira. We are given not a single shred of evidence, textual or otherwise, to support the idea that there has been a “misinterpretation” of Islam.
Eric Holder can keep repeating this stuff, and so can others, so can Barack Obama, for example, until the cows come home. But the more those who presume to protect and instruct us show that they expect us to be satisfied, and that they themselves are apparently satisfied, with soothing banalities and assertions that are easily shown to be baseless, they lose our trust. The very people they claim to lead and to protect stop trusting them. We all know what we are looking for is Muslim terrorists, committing acts of terrorism because of what Islam teaches — the duty of Jihad to remove all barriers to the spread and then the dominance of Islam. They differ from other Muslims only in that they have decided to both participate in Jihad directly rather than indirectly, through financial, diplomatic, propagandistic, or moral support.

And there is a larger lesson, not for Holder alone, but for all those who talk about the “public trust.” Let’s talk about something else: the public mistrust. When the public, on issues of life and death, begins to recognize that it is not being talked to straight by those who govern, and who claim that they govern because they know best how to protect and how to instruct the citizenry, they lose faith in the government. When the public sees that members of the governing class are not telling the truth, but still worse, are actively misrepresenting the nature of the threat and acting as apologists for Islam, the ideology whose promptings explain Muslim terrorism and terrorists, they lose faith in the government. They become fearful, disheartened. We wonder why the words “Islam” and “Muslim” are still not to be used, and why phrases – self-evidently unhelpful, such as “violent extremists,” are used instead. “Extremists” about what? Tell us. Stop making us try to guess or still worse, trying to make us not guess, but to be satisfied with such empty formulations that tell us nothing, that help us understand nothing.

That is not something that people in a mass democracy can, or should, be expected to endure.Those whose most important tasks include those of protecting and instructing us have to stop thinking they can mislead their own citizens, 99% of whom are non-Muslim, in order to avoid offending the 1% who are Muslim, or out of some ill-thought-out Machiavellianism, to avoid offending Muslims in Dar al-Islam.We have to stop describing as part of “our values” what is merely a cripplingly inhibiting fear of offending Muslims. We must let them know we know what Islam calls for and are now prepared to construct policies designed not to deal not merely with this or that terrorist group, but with the Camp of Islam, with all those who by identifying themselves as Muslims can reasonably be treated as adherents of an ideology that we have every right to be alarmed about – the ideology of Islam. ”

Do we not see Obama as apologist for Islam in the following ?

    Washington, DC — At a press conference Friday afternoon, President Obama announced plans for the first ever federally funded Muslim outreach program for all elementary school students grade K-12 beginning February 1st, 2014. The program is designed to educate children about the fundamentals of the Muslim religion and Islamic belief.
    ” I encourage every student in America to participate in your school’s Muslim outreach program. Learn about the Muslim community, the beauty of the Sunnah and the magic of the Koran.”

Said Pope Francis yesterday:

    “Faced with disconcerting episodes of violent fundamentalism, our respect for true followers of Islam should lead us to avoid hateful generalizations, for authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.”

Would the Pope kindly tell me how to read these verses from the Koran as peaceful ?

9.5 Slay the idolaters wherever you find them…lie in ambush everywhere for them.
22.9 Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. Scalding water shall be poured upon their heads, melting their skins and that which is in their bellies. They shall be lashed with rods of iron.
47.4 When you meet the unbelievers in battle strike off their heads.
98.6 The unbelievers among the People of the Book, Christian and Jews, and the pagans shall burn forever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of creatures.
5.60 God has cursed the Jews, transforming them into apes and swine and those who serve the devil.
8.12 I will instill terror into the hearts of the Infidels, strike off the heads then, and strike off from them every fingertip
5.33 Those who make war against Allah and his Apostle shall be put to death or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides.

In contrast, Pope Benedict during his tenure quoted the erudite Byzantine Emperor Manuel ll Paleologus in 1391:

    “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

    Violence, said the Emperor, was incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. When Pope Benedict then called for a dialogue of cultures based on reason, Muslims staged riots , burned the Pope in effigy and murdered a nun.
    Jihadists are, said the Pope in a lecture, within their own frame of reference, justified in believing that God can command anything- even the irrational. And so contemporary jihadists believe that the murder of innocents is not simply morally acceptable, but morally required, if such murders advance the cause of Islam.

And the world’s dream of an effective “moderate” counter-movement is a fantasy. For the simple reason that the Islam of “jihad” can always trump moderates with quotes direct from the Koran. Contextual reinterpretation is not acceptable to the vast majority of Islamic scholars, who also hold to the principle of “abrogation,” the rule that says the more violent verses of the later Koran of the bloody Medina period nullify the more peaceful verses of the earlier Meccan period. For that reason, the argument is solid that terrorism in the final analysis has its roots in the Koran, which comes straight from the being of God, and allows of no reinterpretation. Although it is reluctant to admit it, the world at present is at war with Islam.To pretend or hope otherwise is a pipe dream, one dearly beloved by media people and academics, who are bending over backwards in hopes of placating those who wish to kill them.

IGNORING FACTS

There is no question but what the Koran is the main inspiration behind international terrorism. We don’t have to guess about that. It has been quantified a number of times, through a standard tool of social science, content analysis, which adds up, quantifies, reduces to numbers and percentages the ideas expressed in any given text.

(1) Linguist Tina Magaard of Denmark has a Ph.D. in Textual Analysis and Intercultural Communication from the Sorbonne in Paris, and has spent three years on content analysis comparing the original texts of ten major religions. Says Magaard:

“The texts in Islam distinguish themselves from the texts of other religions by encouraging violence and aggression against people with other religious beliefs. There are also straightforward calls for terror. It is indisputable that the texts encourage terror and violence”.

(2) Another such analysis has been reported on by Moorthy Muthuswamy in his new book “Defeating Political Islam: The New Cold War: ”

“Let me refer to a synthesis that stands out, and conclusively defines what we are up against: 61% of the Koran talks ill of unbelievers or calls for their violent conquest and subjugation, but only 2.6 % of it talks about the overall good of humanity. This statistical analysis forms the basis not just for countering but even for comprehensively discrediting the often quoted description of Islam as a “religion of peace.” In fact, an appropriate and statistically acceptable characterization is that Islam doctrines overwhelmingly preach dislike, hatred, and conquest of unbelievers and that this material constitutes the majority of the content in the Koran.”

IGNORING DANGER

Two other empirically based studies that are being covered up: (abridged)

(1) Shari’a and Violence in American Mosques
by Mordechai Kedar and David Yerushalmi
Middle East Quarterly – Summer 2011

“The mosques surveyed contained a variety of texts, ranging from contemporary printed pamphlets and handouts to classic texts of the Islamic canon. From the perspective of promoting violent jihad, the literature types were ranked in the survey from severe to moderate to nonexistent.
The survey’s findings were that 51 percent of mosques had texts that either advocated the use of violence in the pursuit of a Shari’a-based political order or advocated violent jihad as a duty that should be of paramount importance to a Muslim; 30 percent had only texts that were moderately supportive of violence, 19 percent had no violent texts at all.

On promoting jihad, the study included literature encouraging worshipers to engage in terrorist activity, to provide financial support to jihadists, and to promote the establishment of a caliphate in the United States. These materials also explicitly praised acts of terror against the West; praised symbols or role models of violent jihad; promoted the use of force, terror, war, and violence to implement the Shari’a; emphasized the inferiority of non-Muslim life; promoted hatred and intolerance toward non-Muslims ; and endorsed inflammatory materials with anti-U.S. views. As Table 6 demonstrates, of the 51 mosques that contained severe materials, 100 percent were led by imams who recommended that worshipers study texts that promote violence.”

(2) Reported by WorldNetDaily, Feb. 23, 2008.:

“An undercover survey of more than 1000 mosques and Islamic schools in America has exposed widespread radicalism, including the alarming finding that 3 in 4 Islamic centers are hotbeds of anti-western extremism. The Mapping Sharia in America Project, sponsored by the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, has trained former counterintelligence and counter-terrorism agents from the FBI, CIA, and U.S. military, who are skilled in Arabic and Urdu, to conduct undercover reconnaissance at some 2,300 mosques and Islamic centers and schools across the country. Frank Gaffney, who runs the Center, confirmed that the “vast majority” are inciting insurrection and jihad through sermons by Saudi-trained imans and anti-western literature, videos, and textbooks. Preliminary findings indicate that 80% of the group preach that women are inferior to men and can be beaten for disobedience, that non-Muslims, particularly Jews, are infidels and inferior to Muslims, that jihad or support of jihad not only is a Muslim’s duty but the noblest way, that suicide bombers and other so-called “martyrs” are worthy of the highest praise, and that an Islamic caliphate should one day rule the U.S..”

The danger is also made clear in this statement by Amil Imani, an Iranian born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the U.S.

“Beliefs steer people in life. Some beliefs are harmless, some are the motive force for good and yet others are delusional, misguided, and even outright dangerous. Every version of the belief called “Islam” ranges from the delusional to the dangerous. This delusion presently has in its stranglehold over a billion humans, posing an existential threat to all non-Muslims. To Islam, a non-Muslim is a combatant against Allah and he is fair game to be subjugated and killed. When a billion people adhere to this pathological belief and use it as their marching order of life, the rest of humanity can ignore the threat only at its peril.”

The worst nightmare of those responsible for national security is that lone Muslim terrorist walking into an American city with a nuclear bomb in a van or even in a suitcase. He, and all other ordinary Muslims like him of jihadist inclinations, are the ones who need to hear that what they contemplate will result in massive retaliation on Muslim lands.The immediate need is to reach all ordinary Muslims with the knowledge that what they or their neighbors might be contemplating would result in catastrophic destruction of Muslim lands, including in particular, all religious sites. The knowledge that they and their friends would be the unavoidable “collateral damage” is what it is hoped will cause them to put enormous pressure to stop on everyone they know involved in jihad.

And when it comes to the denial of the danger, Democrats lead the pack:

Religion Poll: American views on Islam closely follow party affiliation. September 8, 2011

A comprehensive new report by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) and the Brookings Institution reveals a deeply divided American public when it comes to Islam and the place of Muslims in the United States. The survey shows that “Americans are struggling to reconcile principles of religious liberty and the inclusion of new groups in America with specific discomfort and fears, particularly around American Muslims and Islam,” says Robert P. Jones, CEO of PRRI.

Some 47 percent of all Americans, according to the poll, believe that the values of Islam are at odds with American values and way of life. And the splits along ideological lines reveal a deeply divided public. Large majorities of Republicans (63 percent) and people who identify with the Tea Party (66 percent) say that Islamic values are in contrast with American values. At the same time, however, a majority of Democrats (55 percent) and independents (53 percent) disagree with that view.

Attitudes surrounding the place of Muslims in American society have become something of a campaign issue, notes Jones. What’s more, he says, “It’s increasingly becoming another kind of issue in the culture wars. We’re seeing polarizing divides around this issue just as we’ve seen in such issues as abortion and same-procreation marriage. That’s one of the new things that this survey shows. We may be living with this as a new front in the culture wars.”

As we said in our article of Aug. 10, 2013, “Asking Us to Hide Murder”:

“The danger from Islam is America’s most pressing problem. It is imperative that the issue be raised to national discussion by the 2016 election. A strong stand on this issue, no doubt by a Republican, could then easily defeat Hillary, whose performance in foreign policy, especially in the case of Benghazi, was not impressive. The only ones to even mention the issue during the 2008, 2012 campaigns were all Republicans, Gingrich, Romney, Giuliani, for example. It is certain that if the Republicans make national security their top priority issue they can beat Hillary.
The only person that can be considered for the next president is the person who will promise to warn the Islamic world of instantaneous, catastrophic retaliation for any further attack on America, to include potentially the total destruction of Mecca.. Once that shield is in place against the deadly irrationality at the heart of Islam we can start a dialogue. Maybe.

WHAT CAN YOU DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY ?

What must be done is educate Americans regarding the true nature of Islam where it has been falsely portrayed by media, academia, and even the Obama administration.We outlined our approach in our last article , “Far Worse,” which went out to thousands of Americans. I urged everyone to help fight the media, academic, and Obama lie that Islam is a “religion of peace” by getting and showing at least on Public Access TV, which is free, the documentary by Gregory M. Davis, “Islam: What the World Needs to Know.” We still hope that someone in Congress will respond to our recent call to show the film to our lawmakers in Washington. Not too long ago Senator Kyle showed the first of the films documenting the connection between the Koran and terrorism,”Fitna”, by the Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilder.Why not show this film, the best we have on this subject, to Congress. And then show it for the American people on one of the TV networks.

Narrated by five of the nation’s top experts on Islam and terrorism, and documented with quotes direct from the Koran, it establishes without a doubt that the violence against non-Muslims, happening in Myanmar and around the world, and here on 9/11 and later in Boston is, and has always been, an inherent characteristic of Islam. The widespread viewing of this film would create a firewall against that collective multiculturalist absurdity that Islam is “a religion of peace,” a mantra that leaves us totally open to disaster. It sets a definitive standard against which all arguments that Islam is a “religion of peace” must fail. See this film

We received no report that anyone tried to get the film shown. It is particularly disturbing that we had no action from any of our Vietnam vet friends. During the years when we went on various missions in support of their cause (see “Vietnam and the Media” at v-v-a-r.org) we received over a thousand letters of support from them.. During the 2004 election 38 units responded to our call for polls, in which 6325 responses showed that 80% of all of them would not vote for Kerry, a finding sent out by United Press and was supported later by a much larger poll by Military Times. If I knew how to do it I could show you a photo of a large number of vets supporting my mission in Chicago to have PBS show a film on Vietnam they were boycotting, holding signs saying “PBS: Show the Film.” Wrote General Westmoreland, “You have done an exhaustive bit of research and I congratulate you.”

Another organization that apparently made no effort to get the film shown is Act for America.With multiple chapters in every state and with goals the same as ours we contact them but still no action.
Tom Trento of The United West recently informed me that he will be showing the film . He has considerable radio and TV resources covering much of Florida. But so far he has not done so.

I need one person to report that he/she has shown the film to their community. I’ll send out a press release to major media telling that it has been done in one community, urging others to follow.

Once again I urge everyone to act. Time is running out, especially as regards Iran and nuclear weapons.. The world cannot live any longer with a religion whose mission is to either convert or murder the rest of mankind, and now has access to the weapons of mass destruction that can make it possible.

Especially when so many are trying to persuade us this is not true.

VIETNAM VETERANS FOR ACADEMIC REFORM
Leonard Magruder – Founder/President
Former professor of psychology – Suffolk College, N.Y..
Director of Counseling and Research – Univ. of N.D.(ret.)
magruder44@aol.com

~~ Posted in full, with permission and by request of Leonard Magruder. Some text formatting done by Bubba.